“Where do we draw the line?”

Justice Donnelly, to the Assistant County Prosecutor

“Are you saying the prosecution is not a direct consequence of the commission of an offense?”

Chief Justice O’Connor to counsel for Yerkey

On September 22, 2021, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. John D.

Update: Read the analysis of the oral argument here.

On September 22, 2021, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. John D. Yerkey 2020-1392. At issue in this case is whether a crime victim may be awarded restitution for lost wages that resulted from her attendance at

“The normal and ordinary use of the word ‘person’ suggests that Ohio voters would not have understood that term to include a public corporation.”

Justice French, majority opinion

“It is beyond the scope of this case to determine whether a municipal corporation is a ‘person’ protected by Marsy’s Law in relation to its proprietary functions.”

Update: On November 12, 2020 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

“You think that when the average voter went to vote on this amendment 2 or 3 years ago, they thought they were creating rights for municipalities?”

Justice DeWine, to counsel for Centerville

“Does

Update: On November 12, 2020 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

On June 2, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in City of Centerville v. Michael P. Knab, 2019-0873. At issue in this case is whether a municipality is

“Taken together, these three considerations—the banks having lost something in which they had a property interest at the moment of the crime, the banks bearing the economic loss by operation of statute, and the banks having been the targets of Allen’s crimes—establish that the banks are victims under any common-sense understanding of that term.”

Justice

Update: On November 21, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.

“Your friends on the other side say the checks were drawn from particular accounts, and those account holders would be the actual victims and not the bank. How do you respond to that?”

Update: On November 21, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.

Read the analysis of the argument here.

On May 8, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. Zachary C. Allen, 2018-0705. At issue

Case Background

Daniel Lalain worked as an engineer for Aero-Instruments, a Cleveland company that designed aviation and aerospace components. Lalain resigned suddenly, and took with him numerous documents and copies of electronic files related to the work he had done. He also kept two probes he had taken home for testing.

Aero-Instruments filed a civil

Update: read what happened when this case was remanded here.

On July 17, 2013 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. Lalain, 2013-Ohio-3093. The case was accepted on both conflict certification and discretionary appeal. In a 5-2 decision written by Justice O’Donnell, for himself and Justices Pfeifer, Kennedy,