“We nevertheless conclude that R.C. 124.27(B) and Ohio’s civil- service scheme as a whole do not express a clear public policy that would support recognizing a wrongful-discharge tort for probationary employees. The General Assembly has spoken clearly: probationary employees do not enjoy the same rights and protections afforded to tenured civil servants.”

Justice French, opinion

Update: On August 20, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

“If 124.27 supposedly makes all probationary employees at-will, then why did the legislature bother mentioning unsatisfactory employees in there?”

Justice Donnelly, to the Deputy State Solicitor

“Aren’t you asking us to give more

Update: On February 12, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.

On April 23, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in Christine House v. Bruce Iacovelli, et al.2018-0434. At issue is whether the statutory penalties for employers imposed

Update: On February 12, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.

Read an analysis of the oral argument here.

On April 23, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in Christine House v. Bruce Iacovelli, et al., 2018-0434. At

On April 12, 2017, by a vote of 4-3, the court dismissed as improvidently accepted McGowan v. Medpace, Inc.,  2017-Ohio-1340. Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French formed the majority. Because Justices Fischer and DeWine sat on this case when it was decided by the First District Court of Appeals, Judges Timothy