Before the changing of the guard at the Ohio Supreme Court, the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s office, joined by the Ohio Attorney General as amicus, moved the Court to reconsider its decision in State v. Hood, 2012-Ohio-5559. In a unanimous 6-0 decision dated December 31, 2012, (Justice McGee Brown’s term had ended and Justice Kennedy
Business Records
Merit Decision. “My Gut Reaction is to Subpoena Verizon. ” The Admissibility of Cell Phone Records. State v Hood.
By Marianna Bettman on
Update: On December 31, 2012, the Supreme Court granted reconsideration in this case and replaced it with Hood II, 2012-Ohio-6208 Read the analysis of Hood II here.
On December 3, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in State v. Hood, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-5559. This case, argued November 8, 2011, was…
What’s On Their Minds: Use of Evidence Rules in a Civil Service Hearing. Ronald L. Royse v. City of Dayton.
By Marianna Bettman on
Update: On June 13, 2012, the Court dismissed this case as improvidentally accepted.
On May 9, 2012, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Ronald L. Royse v. City of Dayton, et al. Royse was fired as a Dayton firefighter for failing a drug test. He challenged the admission of…
Oral Argument Preview: Use of Evidence Rules in a Civil Service Hearing. Ronald L. Royse v. City of Dayton
By Marianna Bettman on
Update: On June 13, 2012, the Court dismissed this case as improvidentally accepted.
Read the analysis of the oral argument in this case here.
On May 9, 2012, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Ronald L. Royse v. City of Dayton, et al. The issue in this case…
What’s On Their Minds: Are Cellphone Records Admissible at Trial as Business Records? State v. Hood
By LexBlog Admin on
Oral Argument Preview: Are Cellphone Records Admissible at Trial as Business Records? State v. Hood.
By Marianna Bettman on