On May 11, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Pryor v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-2907. In a 5-2 opinion written by Justice French, the court held that to perfect an appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Review
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
What’s On Their Minds: How to Vest Jurisdiction in an Unemployment Compensation Appeal. Marcus H. Pryor II v. Director, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.
By Marianna Bettman on
Update: On May 11, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.
“Hasn’t the General Assembly created some confusion by saying the only requirement is to file a timely notice of appeal to vest jurisdiction in the court?” Justice O’Donnell to counsel for the Director…
Oral Argument Preview: Does Failure to Name All Interested Parties in the Notice of Appeal from an Unemployment Compensation Decision Divest the Trial Court of Subject Matter Jurisdiction? Marcus H. Pryor II v. Director, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.
By Marianna Bettman on
Update: On May 11, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.
Read an analysis of the oral argument in this case here.
On January 27, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Marcus H. Pryor II v.
Merit Decision: Standing and Subject Matter Jurisdiction. A Field Day for Civil Procedure Geeks. Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta
By Marianna Bettman on
On October 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta, 2014-Ohio-4275. In a 5-2 opinion written by Chief Justice O’Connor, for herself and Justices Lanzinger, O’Donnell, French, and Kennedy, the court answered the following certified conflict question in the negative:
“When a defendant…
What’s on their Minds: Some Post Schwartzwald Foreclosure Standing Stuff. Bank of America v. Kuchta.
By Marianna Bettman on
Update: On October 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.
On January 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Bank of American, N.A. v. George M. Kuchta, et al., 2013-0304. At issue in this case…
What’s on Their Minds: Does a Trial Court Retain Jurisdiction to Hold a Sex Offender Registration Hearing After the Sentencing Entry has been Journalized? State v. Raber.
By Marianna Bettman on
Update: On December 6, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.
On August 21, 2012, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. Kyle D. Raber, 2011-1383. The issue in this case is whether the trial court…
Oral Argument Preview: Does a Trial Court Retain Jurisdiction to Hold a Sex Offender Registration Hearing After the Sentencing Entry has been Journalized? State v. Raber.
By Marianna Bettman on
Update: On December 6, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.
Read the analysis of the oral argument in this case here.
On August 21, 2012, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. Kyle D.