On May 12, 2021, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. James O’Malley2020-0859. At issue in this case is whether Ohio’s criminal vehicle forfeiture statute constitutes an excessive fine in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution or Article I Section 9 of the

Read an analysis of the argument here.

On May 12, 2021, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. James O’Malley, 2020-0859. At issue in this case is whether Ohio’s criminal vehicle forfeiture statute constitutes an excessive fine in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S.

Update: Batista filed a cert. petition with the U.S. Supreme Court on March 23, 2018. The state waived response.  The petition was denied on April 23, 2018.

On October 26, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. Batista, 2017-Ohio-8304. The court unanimously upheld the constitutionality of R.C.

Update: On October 26, 2017, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

Read the analysis of the argument here

On May 17, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. Orlando Batista, 2016-0903. At issue in the case

On July 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. Mole,  2016-Ohio-5124. In a 4-3 opinion authored by Chief Justice O’Connor, joined in full by Justices Pfeifer and O’Neill, the court struck down R.C. 2907.03(A)(13) on its face, on equal protection grounds. The statute, a subsection of

Update: Ohio Attorney General DeWine appealed the stay of execution order in the Lorraine case to the U.S. Supreme Court. On February 8, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to lift the stay of execution.

As I have previously written here and here, Justice Paul Pfeifer has really stepped up his public criticism of Ohio’s