On May 14, 2014 the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in Oaktree Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Hallmark Bldg. Co. 2014-Ohio-1937. In a 4-3 decision written by Justice O’Neill, for himself, Justices Pfeifer and Lanzinger, and Chief Justice O’Connor, the court held R.C. 2305.131, Ohio’s construction statute of repose, unconstitutional as applied
Construction Statute of Repose
What’s on Their Minds: Retroactive Application of the Construction Statute of Repose. Oaktree Condominium Association, Inc. v. The Hallmark Building Company, et al.
By Marianna Bettman on
Update: On May 14, 2014 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.
On October 9, 2013, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Oaktree Condominium Association, Inc. v. The Hallmark Building Company, et al., 2012-1722. At issue in this…
Oral Argument Preview: Constitutionality of the Retroactive Application of Ohio’s Construction Statute of Repose. Oaktree Condominium Association, Inc. v. The Hallmark Building Co.
By Marianna Bettman on
Update: On May 14, 2014 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.
Read the analysis of the oral argument in this case here.
On October 9, 2013, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Oaktree Condominium Association, Inc. v.